The World of Illusions

Another day, another toilet bowl filled to the brim. A demon crouches down over the chalice of holies and rips a foul loaf into the cup of goodness. Even God, complicit in the disgustingness, enjoys himself while creaming off to the side, allowing the foulness to be center stage in the universe. The priests and survivors of hell kneel behind the rubble, dodging the splashing feces while trying to preserve what little parts of themselves they have remaining that have not been desecrated. God enjoys the show, putting something by force into places that something should not go. The peasants' rectums are destroyed by the violence, and the weeping can be heard in the next galaxy over.

One of the main reasons anyone who attacks the world of illusions directly is socially punished is because that world is the framework within which meaning for reproduction is pursued. Anyone who can see the system sees it clearly: The world of roles, identities, status markers, and desired “stories to be pursued and lived as life” is promoted by the screens, and people reflect that programming back into the interface through imitation and attempting to “mirror it” back at the system in the form of creating media and/or living a life that features themselves as meeting its standard. Whatever standard is agreed upon by means of inferred assumption is then the measuring stick by which the females of the species assess the males, judging them based on how closely they can embody the “story of life as told by the screen” and “enforced by collective meaning.” The male hierarchy then mobilizes to play this strange game of portraying to women a lifestyle that for most men is only attainable through a lifetime agreement of debt to the system in order to qualify for reproduction.   By targeting the feminine instinct for "nesting" and "lifestyle stability" with media-driven standards, the system creates a Biological Gatekeeper. * The man is not just trying to win the woman; he is trying to "buy" his way into the "Story of Life" she has been programmed to demand.

The surface level is the desire of “I have been selected by what is desired, look at me with her, I am worthwhile.” All of the dreams of the system—in fact any dream—always includes at least one observer. In the case of chasing sex and beauty, a big part of the “feeling of success” is being seen by others with a companion who is desirable. It is an extremely heartless world to pursue though, since it requires putting forth your actual emotions of core self on the same level of judgment that your surface conformity act must meet in order to be selected and approved of. This is in fact mandatory humiliation. It is a rule that says, “I must give everything that I am for a life I do not believe in, in order to satisfy a desire for love and approval that is not in fact in approval of what I truly am and believe in.” Everyone must know this on a deep level, but the pain of the desire itself is so acute and expressing itself from our core instincts, that most people are willing to make the trade and live a life of absurd theater.

The actual life that follows this is: mortgage, financial stress, worrying about school systems or societal ills that will affect your children, the knowledge that you can't provide a better world for the life of children and have to go forward into permanent debt anyway, satisfying the lifestyle desires of someone who believes the world of illusions is “actual life,” never being able to say what you know if you figure it out.  

Furthermore, nothing ties you to the system's control mechanisms and mandates as strongly as having children. Your instinct to protect them becomes threaded through “implied threats of loss” and is leveraged toward pressures to conform to its regular updates and modifications. Anything that threatens resource acquisition—such as “new rules or mandates” that require “signing up, or else”—becomes a source of acute leverage to pressure you into acquiescence. The programming then continues onward like this: “Well, if I can't be free, I will work and sacrifice my life so my children can be free and enjoy some of what life has to offer.” Then the children are programmed by watching their parents make this sacrifice, coming to the same assumption: “Life is sacrificing yourself to the system so your children can have a ‘childhood’ or entertainments that the system itself sells you.” Talk about a joke.  In this case, the sacrifice does not amount to love, it is a trick played upon love itself to pressure people into sacrificing themselves to the system in a continuous loop.  Hell anyone?

Nothing enforces "Compliance" like a child’s face. The system knows that a man who will not bend for himself will break for his son. * By threading your love for your children through the "Resource Acquisition" machine, the system ensures you will never truly revolt.  You will sign the "updates," you will accept the "mandates," and you will swallow the "foul loaf" from the demon’s chalice because you've been convinced that your Sacrifice is Love. * But it’s not love; it’s a Leverage Loop. You are sacrificing your freedom so your children can grow up to sacrifice theirs.  The wink and grin of duper's delight wins again.


So the system targets the female of the species at large with “mandatory normalized lifestyle programming” which then becomes the standard by-proxy that men adopt as a value to pursue since it is in male nature to meet the collective feminine standard of “a life that ought to be lived” as part of engaging in reproduction. Men routinely pursue lifestyles or achievements that are not born from within, they are imposed from without. This is why relationships become largely “an act” that erodes over time, and women will note that the man has changed or appears to have misrepresented himself at the beginning of the relationship. This is because misrepresentation is the standard of the species itself in order to engage in the world of illusions that governs the “story of humanity,” and along with it, access to reproduction. If you have to adopt a lifestyle, a belief system, and a set of values you don't feel is real or worthwhile in order to bond, it follows that “method acting” is the adaptation that is required to “date.” This is why men who are aware that it is an illusion will say, “How do I talk to women?” The answer to this question by “dating guru world” is always a direct admission that falsifying persona is required along with explicit techniques to achieve that end. No one cares to connect the dots to paint the picture of the bind that people are in.

The "Dating Guru" world is an admission of Universal Fraud. If a man has to "perform" a persona that aligns with the "Screen's Version of Success" just to be selected, then the foundation of the bond is a lie.  This is why the "Activation Phase" feels so good—it's two actors enjoying the high of a successful opening night.  The "Integration Phase" fails because the "Method Actor" eventually gets tired.

It is the world of illusions, an interface that amounts to “assumptions inside instantaneous collective perception” that govern the “goals of becoming” that we are motivated to adopt. The problem is that while these are the actual conditions of engagement, we have a surface narrative that asserts “authentic self” is taking place, or that the conditions do not actually exist. An automatic denial mechanism is inserted into the root kernel of the human operating system in order to believe that one state of affairs is occurring while an entire compartmentalized set of true motivations and pressures is processed separately.

None of it is real. As it stands, “Love” is a manipulated instinct that motivates conformity by threatening existential security and social meaning. The games played therein are leverage pressures and emotional violence targeting desires and needs. This is why, if you expose the game, the system activates in the general believers and attacks you on the basis of character or moral failure (hating X, ideological gender violence, etc).  If people realized that their "Authentic Love" was actually a "Manipulated Instinct" used to sell them debt and conformity, the entire "Automated Shithouse" would lose its power supply.  They call you a "villain" or a "hater" because it’s a Narrative Firewall. It prevents the "General Believers" from actually hearing the content of your message.


Here is the thing though: you don't want anyone who is easily maneuvered to believe reputation assertions that are seeded through buzzwords and the first round of hearing. Anyone who believes immediately what is asserted by strangers is demonstrating in real time that their unconscious primary loyalty is to the collective story machine. This means they are incapable of not betraying someone in a primary bond because if a different story is seeded by the collective narrative machine, they will side with it without thinking. Humanity is now largely completely under the spell of this narrative machine, and is demonstrating total and complete inability to be anything other than a lifeless extension of it.

If someone is willing to believe a character-assassination story just because it was "seeded" by the collective machine, they are telling you they are Spiritually Vacant.  They are not individuals; they are "Terminal Nodes" for the system.  You cannot have a "Primary Bond" with a node. A node will always choose the network over the person.